Skip to main content
Policy & Funding· Daily Pulse

35 State Attorneys General Just Told the White House Not to Delay the Hemp-THC Ban. The White House Wanted To.

A November deadline to recriminalize intoxicating hemp products is now the center of a fight that runs from a Senate amendment all the way to a personal call from the President.

ByThe Rize NewsroomAugust 7, 20262 min readCannabinoids

The federal government set a deadline months ago to ban intoxicating hemp-derived THC products — the drinks, gummies, and vapes sold at gas stations and smoke shops nationwide under a loophole in the 2018 Farm Bill — and that deadline is supposed to arrive in November. This week, the deadline nearly slipped, and then it didn’t, and the fight over why says more about where cannabinoid policy is actually headed than the ban itself does.

A ban set to take effect in three months just survived a quiet attempt to push it back — and the people who stopped that were state attorneys general, not Congress.

The Senate’s own funding bill had proposed pushing the ban’s effective date to December 11 — six extra weeks for an industry that has spent a year lobbying to keep the loophole open. Sen. Ted Budd of North Carolina filed an amendment this week to strip that delay language back out, keeping the original date intact, according to Marijuana Moment’s reporting. The White House had reportedly been pushing the opposite direction: President Trump personally called Budd to lobby against the amendment, and Vice President Vance reportedly worked Senate Republicans on the same ask. Meanwhile, a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general from 35 states and territories sent a joint letter opposing any delay — the ban would redefine hemp as containing no more than 0.3% total THC and cap finished products at 0.4 milligrams of THC per container, closing the gap that currently lets gas-station drinks and gummies carry a full recreational dose. The AGs’ argument is that unregulated intoxicating-hemp products — sold with none of the age verification, potency labeling, or dosing controls that govern licensed cannabis — are reaching minors right now, every day the loophole stays open.

That’s the actual split here, and it doesn’t run along the lines you’d guess. It isn’t prohibition versus legalization — most of the people pushing to close the hemp loophole aren’t anti-cannabis; several are the same officials overseeing their own states’ regulated marijuana markets, and their complaint is specifically that unregulated hemp THC is undercutting the products their states already require to be tested and age-gated. It’s regulated markets versus an accidental one, and for three months, an accident has been winning.

If you work with families or young people, the practical note is this: hemp-derived THC products are legally distinct from marijuana today, sold without the purchase-age enforcement most states apply to licensed cannabis, and that gap doesn’t close until November even in the best case for the ban’s supporters. Whatever your view on cannabinoid policy generally, that’s the specific thing worth flagging to a parent or a client this week — not because the drug is new, but because the loophole selling it to them without an ID check is.

Filed Under

policytrends

Keep up with the reporting.

One email each morning with the stories that put days like this in context.

A daily, no-spam briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Continue reading

More from this section