Skip to main content
Harm Reduction· Daily Pulse

No One Has Died of a Cannabis Overdose. That Doesn't Mean It Hasn't Cost People Their Lives.

A DEA line about overdoses is making the rounds again, just as a Massachusetts repeal fight forces voters to pick a side. Both camps are skipping the same group of people.

ByThe Rize NewsroomOctober 7, 20262 min readCannabinoids

Two true sentences about cannabis are currently being used as weapons against each other. The first: a newly updated DEA report states that no deaths from marijuana overdose have been reported, according to Marijuana Moment’s October 6 newsletter. The second: some people cannot stop, and it costs them jobs, relationships and years.

“No overdose deaths” is a fact about the ending. It is not a fact about the middle.

The DEA line is worth taking at face value, and worth noting for what else came with it: Marijuana Moment says the same report describes state cannabis law changes more favorably than earlier editions, and that the Treasury Department and IRS have named tax guidance for the industry a priority after the federal rescheduling. We have not seen the full DEA report, so treat the framing as Marijuana Moment’s until we have. The line itself has appeared in DEA publications for years.

Now the middle. NIH reported on research from 2012 and 2013 finding that about 30% of people who had used marijuana in the past year met criteria for a use disorder. Those are old numbers from a very different market, and “met criteria” includes things like failed attempts to cut down and withdrawal, not just the worst cases. But they describe something the overdose line cannot: a person who wants to stop and finds out that wanting is not enough. In Massachusetts, where voters face a November ballot question on repealing legalization, peer support specialist Loretta Scapin told WAMC that many people don’t realize marijuana can be an addiction.

Both sides of that fight have a reason to skip this person. Legalization advocates point to the overdose line and stop there. Repeal campaigns point to harm and propose prohibition, which does not help someone get through a hard week two of trying to stop. Neither argument is about that person.

If you are a provider, the question for your next team meeting is simple: do your intake forms ask about cannabis at the same level of detail as alcohol and opioids, and do you have anything to offer when the answer is yes? If you are the person who cannot cut down, you are not weak and you are not rare. Saying so out loud to someone is the first honest move.

The question to ask of any policy this month is not whether it kills. It is whether it helps the person trying to stop.

Filed Under

psychologypolicyCannabis

Keep up with the reporting.

One email each morning with the stories that put days like this in context.

A daily, no-spam briefing. Unsubscribe anytime.

Continue reading

More from this section