No One Has Died of a Cannabis Overdose. That Doesn't Mean It Hasn't Cost People Their Lives.
A DEA line about overdoses is making the rounds again, just as a Massachusetts repeal fight forces voters to pick a side. Both camps are skipping the same group of people.
Two true sentences about cannabis are currently being used as weapons against each other. The first: a newly updated DEA report states that no deaths from marijuana overdose have been reported, according to Marijuana Moment’s October 6 newsletter. The second: some people cannot stop, and it costs them jobs, relationships and years.
“No overdose deaths” is a fact about the ending. It is not a fact about the middle.
The DEA line is worth taking at face value, and worth noting for what else came with it: Marijuana Moment says the same report describes state cannabis law changes more favorably than earlier editions, and that the Treasury Department and IRS have named tax guidance for the industry a priority after the federal rescheduling. We have not seen the full DEA report, so treat the framing as Marijuana Moment’s until we have. The line itself has appeared in DEA publications for years.
Now the middle. NIH reported on research from 2012 and 2013 finding that about 30% of people who had used marijuana in the past year met criteria for a use disorder. Those are old numbers from a very different market, and “met criteria” includes things like failed attempts to cut down and withdrawal, not just the worst cases. But they describe something the overdose line cannot: a person who wants to stop and finds out that wanting is not enough. In Massachusetts, where voters face a November ballot question on repealing legalization, peer support specialist Loretta Scapin told WAMC that many people don’t realize marijuana can be an addiction.
Both sides of that fight have a reason to skip this person. Legalization advocates point to the overdose line and stop there. Repeal campaigns point to harm and propose prohibition, which does not help someone get through a hard week two of trying to stop. Neither argument is about that person.
If you are a provider, the question for your next team meeting is simple: do your intake forms ask about cannabis at the same level of detail as alcohol and opioids, and do you have anything to offer when the answer is yes? If you are the person who cannot cut down, you are not weak and you are not rare. Saying so out loud to someone is the first honest move.
The question to ask of any policy this month is not whether it kills. It is whether it helps the person trying to stop.
Sources Cited
- 01.B
- 02.A
- 03.B
Filed Under
psychologypolicyCannabis
Keep up with the reporting.
One email each morning with the stories that put days like this in context.
Continue reading
More from this section
Tasmania's First U-Class Opioid Death Is a Warning About a Supply Nobody Can See
A Tasmanian overdose death involving a U-class synthetic opioid, and what Australian research says about why these compounds slip past the people who take them.
Harm ReductionMassachusetts Banned Kratom Overnight. The People Using It to Stay Off Opioids Got a Withdrawal and No Plan.
Massachusetts classified kratom as a Schedule I drug by emergency order in August. Recovery workers say there is no immediate treatment for the people who now face withdrawal, and they fear a return to opioids.
Harm ReductionNaloxone Won't Touch Medetomidine. The Withdrawal That Follows Can Land Someone in the ICU for Weeks.
Medetomidine reports rose from 247 to 8,233 in two years and the withdrawal can be severe. What the CDC says clinicians and outreach workers should know.